Fehr Thinks of Caps as “a Pretty Old Team”

“I’ve never experienced a start to a season like this,” Karl Alzner said after the Capitals’ 3-2 loss Tuesday to the Toronto Maple Leafs.

The Capitals, however briefly, have the worst record in hockey right now, although they’ve played three more games than the Calgary Flames, who are second to last.

The regression has been across the board. The offense does not produce. The defense does not prevent. The goalies can’t put 60 good minutes together, either. At first, special teams were killing them. On Tuesday, they won the special teams’ battles and still lost by a goal.

The core of this team has been there long enough to see the other side of the curve. This, despite a rookie head coach and a new system, is not an inexperienced roster.

This is a team that took the Stanley Cup champions on last year in a playoff series and beat them. This is a team that took an adept New York Rangers club and forced a Game 7. This is a team that has had goaltenders practically do headstands in playoffs in recent years to help contribute.

Eric Fehr said something that made me pause in a post-practice interview Saturday.  We were talking about balancing out the adrenaline rush of a rivalry with keeping focused on the ice, and he told me, as part of that conversation, “We’ve got a pretty old team.”

He moved on, but I didn’t. I know there’s been talk of how the ‘Young Guns’ aren’t that young anymore, but it was interesting to hear a player refer to it so casually, like it was embedded in the team psyche.

“We are an old team,” Fehr said. “If you look around, we don’t have a lot of rookies on our team. I don’t even know if we have a rookie on our team this year…I guess Kundy [Tomas Kundratek] right now, but that’s about it, so for the most part we’ve got guys that have been in the league for a number of years, and I guess the way this league’s getting younger and younger, that would make us an old team.”

This has not been a graceful aging. Being an old team isn’t inherent to being either bad or good. But for the Capitals, it’s particularly poignant, because they’re far from where a team that’s grown old together should be.

This team has made the postseason for five consecutive years. And ever since 2010, the questions have piled up faster than the answers.

Fehr is right. In past years, there were players being developed at this NHL level–first the young guns, then players like Marcus Johansson, or defensive pairings like Alzner and John Carlson. Green goalies became the Capitals’ staple, and three of them–Varlamov, Neuvirth and Holtby–showed they were NHL-worthy. But now, the team is playing with an even worse record.

Perhaps, in 10 or so games, things will have clicked, and people will be able to read this column and laugh. The special teams were practically perfect last night. There were moments in games where you could feel the comeback energy, only to have the actual comeback never materialize.

The Caps’ story is a simple reminder that making good history–trying to be that first team to win Lord Stanley for a franchise–is hard.

This entry was posted in Washington Capitals and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Fehr Thinks of Caps as “a Pretty Old Team”

  1. morgan says:

    Good points but in two seasons–this one and last year’s–we’ve used three coaches with basically the same personnel. Fehr’s point regarding rookies is a good one but the fact staring one in the face is they were all chosen by GMGM. A good friend of mine was close to Bruce Budreau and he told my friend Re a GMGM trade that he found out about it from the media. Bruce, according to my friend, and I assume the other coaches in the triumvirate, have no input on personnel. True the young guns aren’t so young but neither are they grey beards either. There seems to be rot in the team that is being revealed by lack-luster play and mistakes that seasoned professionals shouldn’t be making on a regular basis. My opinion, and I hope events on the ice will prove me wrong,is the rot starts with the player wearing the “C.” He seems to be satisfied with collecting his paycheck and showing up for games. At this rate moving his contract will be impossible unless the Cap’s pay a good part of it–Jagr two, perhaps? Maybe this is viewing the glass as half-empty but I’m a pessimist by nature and I don’t see the Cap’s turning things around this season, nor in the future as long as GMGM is calling the shot. I hope I’m wrong.

  2. ? says:

    So why are you guys ‘onfrozenblog’ giving Oates such a pass?

  3. morgan says:

    Oates wasn’t dealt the best hand by GMGM when he took the job as my prior post mentioned. For all I know, he may now regret taking the job after seeing first hand the mess in DC. If the season continues going south, I imagine Oates will start getting increased criticism. Keep your eye on Riberio. He is an unrestriced free agent after this season. If he refuses to re-sign with the Caps, that tells me he wants no more part of the can of worms that is the Caps’ hockey situation. Same applies to Brouwer.

  4. ? says:

    I should have been more specific…I was referring to the contributors..Elizabeth for example. Why are you giving Adam Oates such a pass for what is happening? The OFB writers and contributors didn’t hold back on Bruce and he is a far better coach! …..???

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s